Comments for Jeff's Exposing Scientology blog

Comment on Scientologist brings a gun to peaceful protest by Daniela

Daniela — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:11:06 +0000

theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/
This site is the truth.
people who do this are very wrong.
never be a scientoligest.
Tom Cruise and katy homes should not be doing this!

Comment on Scientologist brings a gun to peaceful protest by Domonique

Domonique — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:06:39 +0000

theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/
Everyone should go to this website.
It shows the truth about scientology!

Comment on About by Rob Thomas

Rob Thomas — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:08:36 +0000

Jeff,

I am an ex scn. and VERY interested in helping you help the lIsa Mcpherson case. I can try and get your team an advance on the settlement to keep things going. If you are interested, go to my website and then contact me.

The breach of contract case I could get an advance on as well.

Comment on An OT visits a psychiatrist by angela

angela — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:23:40 +0000

Xena? Don’t you mean Xenu? lol.

Comment on About by Kieran Bennett

Kieran Bennett — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:07:29 +0000

Have you been following the wikileaks of secret scientology documents? If you’re interested I’ve posted a wrap up of what’s been released so far.

Comment on April 12 protest; we’re ready! by inquisitive

inquisitive — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:15:08 +0000

This comment, which was submitted on a “My Scientology” Google blog site which gave a list of numerous scholars who have endorsed Scientology as a religion, has not been posted. Is Scientology cencoring dialog?

The text is as follows:

Critics of Scientology do not argue about Scientology calling itself a religion. Many of the sholars you refer to simply look at the definitions (marks) of a religion. And Hubbard included those marks in his production of Scientology.

Many of the scholars of religion simply accept what the religion says about itself without any critical analysis of the material given them.

Scientology is known for offering financial inducements to persons or groups which can be supportive of their claims. I doubt that all of these scholars did their work for free.

The issue is the BEHAVIOR of Scientology. Even Dr. Darrol Bryant, whom you list, at the conclusion of one of his articles on Scientology said that whether it is a good or bad religion is a matter of public discussion or debate.

And J. Gordon Melton, who is know for basicaly compiling materials which religions write about themselves, reflected his lack of information about Scientology in his work “The Church of Scientology” published by Signature Books. In fact he makes actual historical mistakes such as claiming that Hubbard “never claimed the kind of formal academic credentials which the average scientist or physician possesses” (page 58). Yet many people have an early copy of “The Problems of Work, Scientology applied to the Work-a-Day World” by L. Ron Hubbard, C.E., Ph.D.

Where he got his degree in Chemical Engineering is not known. What is know is that he bought his Ph.D. from Sequoia University, a degree mill which was shut down by California authorities.

All of this still leaves the basic issue to be discussed.

I would call to the attention of this writer a comment I once heard. “The hottest places in hell (whatever that is) are reserved for people who try to manipulate the idealism of others to their own selfish aims.”

How much are the leaders who head the Church of Spiritual Technology and who regulate the Religious Technology Center, which licenses the Church of Scientology…how much are they making through the activities of the lower level Scientologist who are driven to produce more profits for the organization?

Sorry, but I believe that Time Magazine was correct in calling the Church of Scientology “a cult of greed and power….which operates in a mafia-like fashion, a huge global racket”. And it is using many young, idealistic people to reach its goals.

Comment on April 12 protest; we’re ready! by Nemo

Nemo — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:16:46 +0000

Anonymous is the final boss period. consisting of everyone that the scientologists alienated, the people who will one day take this world as their own (the next generation of people as a whole) and those who seek to do something about the wrongs in this world. Scientology has every right to COWER and be afraid. Not because of the “bomb threats” which were traced back to scientologists. but because of their own actions.

there is a term its called “foot bullet”
everything the scientologists do is a mark against them because of their policies.

Comment on April 12 protest; we’re ready! by Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:17:18 +0000

Insight into the case against Scientolgy. Very interesting reading! Anonymous is child’s play compared to what they’ve gone up against.

http://www.whyaretheydead.net/lisa_mcpherson/bob/affi_stacy2_04_29.htm

Comment on Anon outed for speaking out against Scientology by Fredric L. Rice

Fredric L. Rice — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:58:32 +0000

Does anyone still think that Scientology is some how a religion? This type of behavior has been committed by Scientology since it was created, and everything about Scientology smacks of organized crime, gangsters, extortion, kidnapping, everything one expects from organizations like the Gambino Mafia or South American narcotics cartels.

Comment on Anonymous needs a translator by Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:08:56 +0000

We don’t need a leader if someone wishes to talk to the press they can. Some anons request permits and stuff. I mean people do what they feel they must. And we move from there. But we had quite a lot of press lately which is pretty good and they just talk to whoever they can find which I am game for. And whenever an anon falls 5 more take their place.