<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jeff's Exposing Scientology blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on in which I present my paper to AoIR by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/in-which-i-present-my-paper-to-aoir/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/?p=203#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Wow, a fellow cynic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a fellow cynic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on in which I present my paper to AoIR by anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/in-which-i-present-my-paper-to-aoir/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/?p=203#comment-331</guid>
		<description>To be a successful academic, you have to aim at being the first to accomplish something challenging, which can take years or a lifetime.  Minutely useful papers are misleading because only new things will be accepted to be published, and there aren&#039;t usually that much.  But you can survive by being opportunists, publishing something minor here and there to show that you are doing some work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be a successful academic, you have to aim at being the first to accomplish something challenging, which can take years or a lifetime.  Minutely useful papers are misleading because only new things will be accepted to be published, and there aren&#8217;t usually that much.  But you can survive by being opportunists, publishing something minor here and there to show that you are doing some work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on comment on Project Chanology article here by drstrangelove</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/comment-on-project-chanology-article-here/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>drstrangelove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Dear Jeff,

Most excellent article. The first Operation Chanology raid occurred on February 2, 2009 in Orlando Florida where approximately 150 protesters turned out.

Jeff responds:  I&#039;m sure you mean February 2, 2008. And yes, I should have mentioned that. You were the ones who started with the suit and tie idea, yes?  I didn&#039;t remember how many had showed up there.  VWD!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jeff,</p>
<p>Most excellent article. The first Operation Chanology raid occurred on February 2, 2009 in Orlando Florida where approximately 150 protesters turned out.</p>
<p>Jeff responds:  I&#8217;m sure you mean February 2, 2008. And yes, I should have mentioned that. You were the ones who started with the suit and tie idea, yes?  I didn&#8217;t remember how many had showed up there.  VWD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anonymous related book: &#8216;Here Comes Everybody&#8217; by sandrar</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/annonymous-related-book-here-comes-everybody/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scientology banned from editing Wikipedia by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/scientology-banned-from-editing-wikipedia/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/scientology-banned-from-editing-wikipedia/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/29/wikipedia_bans_scientology/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/29/wikipedia_bans_scientology/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/29/wikipedia_bans_scientology/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scientology banned from editing Wikipedia by sue</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/scientology-banned-from-editing-wikipedia/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/scientology-banned-from-editing-wikipedia/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>need more info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>need more info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scientology banned from editing Wikipedia by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/scientology-banned-from-editing-wikipedia/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/scientology-banned-from-editing-wikipedia/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>cant get full page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cant get full page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I closed my youtube account by HouseSpider</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/i-closed-my-youtube-account/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>HouseSpider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-320</guid>
		<description>DUDE, reopen it if you can.  All closing the account does is guarantee that people won&#039;t see ANY of your videos.  A YouTube boycott will be less noticeable to YT staff than a gnat buzzing around an elephant unless you have tens of thousands of users involved.

I have had PLENTY of vids flagged as violating this or DMCA that.  Just fight them!  I&#039;ve had many of my videos restored.  In fact, I&#039;m about to make a DMCA counter-claim myself.  Getting your account closed was EXACTLY what $cientology wanted.  You have given them a win and made them moar upstat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DUDE, reopen it if you can.  All closing the account does is guarantee that people won&#8217;t see ANY of your videos.  A YouTube boycott will be less noticeable to YT staff than a gnat buzzing around an elephant unless you have tens of thousands of users involved.</p>
<p>I have had PLENTY of vids flagged as violating this or DMCA that.  Just fight them!  I&#8217;ve had many of my videos restored.  In fact, I&#8217;m about to make a DMCA counter-claim myself.  Getting your account closed was EXACTLY what $cientology wanted.  You have given them a win and made them moar upstat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on comment on Project Chanology article here by Родион Кузьмин</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/comment-on-project-chanology-article-here/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Родион Кузьмин</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Скажите, а можно ли взять новости с вашего сайта? Со ссылкой на первоисточник разумеется. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Скажите, а можно ли взять новости с вашего сайта? Со ссылкой на первоисточник разумеется. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on comment on Project Chanology article here by anonymash</title>
		<link>http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/comment-on-project-chanology-article-here/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultxpt.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-316</guid>
		<description>TO SEANNER:

There are three primary reasons why CoS cannot infiltrate Anonymous, and the article to a certain extent explains two of them:

1) no true organization - even if CoS flooded the boards that anons organize on with notions that anonymous should stop protesting, then the people who actually protest can still simply choose to turn up. there is no way to enforce peer pressure in an anonymous setting - plus our mods are good at weeding out people who do not stay on target.

2) CoS is very careful with letting their members go online. it is a too great a source of true facts on the cult, something that CoS does not want its members exposed to. the mass infiltration required to make it appear as if the majority of anonymous wanted to stop would take too many people to pull off. similarly, on most chanology boards those &#039;forbidden&#039; facts are posted very regularly simply to ward off scilon spys. (or to taint them, or piss them off, whatever)

3) very few people have actually been fair gamed, compared to how many protest. equally, then while CoS was VERY aggressive when Chanology started, now after 1½ years of protests they have actually changed tactics. they no longer seek out anonymous for confrontation (bullbaiting) as much as they used to, in many places anons have not seen scilon handlers (those sent out by CoS to &#039;handle&#039; anons when protesting) in a very long time. CoS has essentially given up fighting anonymous, and instead barricaded themselves.
 - the reasons to this are many, both that CoS fears loosing members since anonymous tries very hard to inform the people sent out against them of CoS&#039;s true nature (to make them doubt, leave the cult), and because its resource intensive for the cult, and because anonymous has been VERY good at finding all the cults dirty secrets, which are delicious for the purpose of convincing people to leave the cult.

come to www.whyweprotest.net - ask around if you&#039;re concerned - we will give you the trufax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO SEANNER:</p>
<p>There are three primary reasons why CoS cannot infiltrate Anonymous, and the article to a certain extent explains two of them:</p>
<p>1) no true organization &#8211; even if CoS flooded the boards that anons organize on with notions that anonymous should stop protesting, then the people who actually protest can still simply choose to turn up. there is no way to enforce peer pressure in an anonymous setting &#8211; plus our mods are good at weeding out people who do not stay on target.</p>
<p>2) CoS is very careful with letting their members go online. it is a too great a source of true facts on the cult, something that CoS does not want its members exposed to. the mass infiltration required to make it appear as if the majority of anonymous wanted to stop would take too many people to pull off. similarly, on most chanology boards those &#8216;forbidden&#8217; facts are posted very regularly simply to ward off scilon spys. (or to taint them, or piss them off, whatever)</p>
<p>3) very few people have actually been fair gamed, compared to how many protest. equally, then while CoS was VERY aggressive when Chanology started, now after 1½ years of protests they have actually changed tactics. they no longer seek out anonymous for confrontation (bullbaiting) as much as they used to, in many places anons have not seen scilon handlers (those sent out by CoS to &#8216;handle&#8217; anons when protesting) in a very long time. CoS has essentially given up fighting anonymous, and instead barricaded themselves.<br />
 &#8211; the reasons to this are many, both that CoS fears loosing members since anonymous tries very hard to inform the people sent out against them of CoS&#8217;s true nature (to make them doubt, leave the cult), and because its resource intensive for the cult, and because anonymous has been VERY good at finding all the cults dirty secrets, which are delicious for the purpose of convincing people to leave the cult.</p>
<p>come to <a href="http://www.whyweprotest.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.whyweprotest.net</a> &#8211; ask around if you&#8217;re concerned &#8211; we will give you the trufax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
